After the Jewish people were victorious in their war against the Midianites, Elazar the High Priest taught them the laws of “kosherizing” food utensils taken from the spoils of the enemy.1 First, vessels that came in contact with hot non-kosher foods were to be purged by fire. Then the verse instructs: “They shall be purified; indeed they shall be cleansed in the niddah waters.” This is interpreted by the Talmud2 to mean that the vessels should be purified by immersion in the waters used by a niddah for her purification—a mikvah. The verse then says that in the case of vessels that were not used with hot foods, one need only “pass them through water.” Rashi3 interprets this to mean that all vessels—including those not used with hot food—must be immersed in the mikvah.
Traces of non-kosher food can remain in a dish even when it appears to be clean. Thus the function of the initial cleansing by fire (or hot water, depending on how it was used) is to remove any such remnants of forbidden food. The immersion of the vessel in a mikvah, however, serves a different purpose. The reason for this immersion is to bring the vessel into the holy domain of the Jewish people.4 When a food utensil is in the possession of a non-Jew, in addition to the fact that it is presumably used for non-kosher food, it also acquires a spiritual impurity as a result of being in a potentially non-kosher state. When it is purchased by a Jew, who will from now on (presumably) use it only for kosher food, it needs a ritual cleansing to remove the impurity brought about by the potential use of the vessel for non-kosher food.5
For this reason, the law of immersion of vessels applies even when one purchases new, never-used food utensils from a non-Jew. Of course, if they were used, they must first be “kosherized” (see Koshering Appliances and Utensils), and only afterwards should they be immersed in a mikvah.6
If a (metal) utensil is disposable, it need not be immersed. If one plans on reusing the utensil, but it is not durable enough to be used on a permanent basis, some say they need not be immersed, others disagree.12
There is no halachic basis for the common misconception that non-disposable utensils may be used once without immersion.13
It is forbidden to use utensils requiring immersion before immersing them.24 If one did prepare food in such utensils, the food is not forbidden,25 but it must be removed from those vessels as soon as one realizes26 the error. The utensil must be immersed no matter how many times it was used without immersion.
One need not bear in mind any special intention during the immersion. For this reason, this mitzvah may be performed by a child. In addition, if a Jew makes the blessing and immerses at least one item, he may allow a non-Jew to immerse the rest of the vessels. In such cases, however, a Jewish adult must supervise to make sure the immersion was done properly.27
In order for the immersion to be valid, no intervening substances may be found on the item being immersed. For this reason, one must make sure to remove all labels or any rust, etc., before immersing the vessel. The sticky glue left behind from stickers must also be removed. (Eucalyptus oil is good for this.) If the sticker is meant to be left on the item—for example, care instructions—it need not be removed.28
Before immersing the vessel, one should recite the blessing: Baruch atah . . . asher kidshanu . . . al tevilat keli [or kelim for more than one vessel].
The English translation is: Blessed are You, L‑rd our G‑d, King of the Universe, Who has sanctified us with His commandments, and commanded us concerning the immersion of a vessel [or vessels].
This blessing may not be made in the room of a mikvah in which people immerse, as this area has the status of a bathhouse in which blessings may not be recited.29 If one is immersing vessels in such a mikvah, he may recite the blessing while standing outside the mikvah area, then walk in and start the immersion. The walking between the recitation of the blessing and the beginning of the mitzvah is not considered an interruption, because it is necessary for the immersion.30
Please note: Many types of utensils must be immersed without a blessing (see above). If one is immersing many utensils, some of which require a blessing and some of which do not, one should recite the blessing, immerse those utensils that require a blessing first, and then immerse the rest of the utensils. It is best to immerse such vessels together, so that the blessing will include the items that do not require a blessing.31
One may not immerse utensils in a mikvah on Shabbat or major holiday.43
If it is already Shabbat or the holiday and one needs to use the utensil, one may give it to a non-Jew and “borrow” it back, as explained above. After Shabbat it must be immersed.44
Even if one sold one’s utensils to a non-Jew for the duration of Passover, he does not need to immerse them again when buying them back after Passover. Although the sale to the non-Jew was legally binding, there was no real possibility that he would actually use the items.45
| FOOTNOTES | |
| 1. | |
| 2. |
Talmud, Avodah Zarah 75b. |
| 3. |
Rashi on Numbers, ibid. |
| 4. |
Jerusalem Talmud, end of Tractate Avodah Zarah. |
| 5. |
Likkutei Sichot, vol. 18, pp. 367–368. |
| 6. |
Code of Jewish Law, Yoreh De’ah 120:2. See Shach there, sec. 5: if one reversed the order, he should immerse it again without a blessing. |
| 7. |
Talmud, ibid. Most commentaries understand that the obligation to immerse glassware is of rabbinic origin. See Rabbi Akiva Eiger on Yoreh De’ah, ibid., sec. 14. |
| 8. |
See sources quoted in Tevilat Keilim by Rabbi Tzvi Cohen, pp. 226–227. |
| 9. |
Code of Jewish Law, Yoreh De’ah 120:7. |
| 10. |
Rama, ibid. |
| 11. |
Ibid. |
| 12. |
Tevilat Keilim, p. 57. |
| 13. |
See ibid., p. 101. |
| 14. |
Talmud, Avodah Zarah 75b. |
| 15. |
Code of Jewish Law, Yoreh De’ah 120:5, in Rema. |
| 16. |
Code of Jewish Law, ibid., par. 4. But see Tevilat Keilim, p. 55, that a vessel that normally touches the food may not be used before immersion even if one puts down foil or paper between the food and the vessel. |
| 17. |
Tevilat Keilim, p. 65. |
| 18. |
Ibid., p. 64. |
| 19. |
Ibid., p. 66. |
| 20. |
Based on Tevilat Keilim, p. 67. |
| 21. |
See Code of Jewish Law, Yoreh De’ah 201:2 and commentaries. |
| 22. |
See Shulchan Aruch HaRav, Orach Chaim 88:1. |
| 23. |
Pit’chei Teshuvah, Yoreh De’ah 120:3. |
| 24. |
Code of Jewish Law, Yoreh De’ah 120:8 in Rema. |
| 25. |
Ibid., par. 16. |
| 26. |
Tevilat Keilim, p. 106. |
| 27. |
Code of Jewish Law, Yoreh De’ah 120:14–15. |
| 28. |
Ibid., par. 11. |
| 29. |
See Code of Jewish Law, Orach Chaim 84. Despite this prohibition, Ashkenazi custom allows women to recite the blessing for their own immersion while they are in the mikvah pool itself (Code of Jewish Law, Yoreh De’ah 200 in Rema; see Taz and Shach there). |
| 30. |
I heard this from my teacher, Rav Chaim Sholom Deitch of Jerusalem. |
| 31. |
Tevilat Keilim, p. 172. |
| 32. |
Code of Jewish Law, ibid., 120:12. |
| 33. |
Ibid., par. 2. See Rema there, and commentaries of Shach, sec. 6, and Taz, sec. 4. |
| 34. |
Ibid. |
| 35. |
Ibid., 202:9. |
| 36. |
See ibid., 119:5, and commentary of Taz, sec. 9. |
| 37. |
There is a common custom to immerse each item three times, but I have not found a source for this. See Tevilat Keilim, pp. 190–191, for a discussion. |
| 38. |
See Tevilat Keilim, p. 112. |
| 39. |
Rabbi Akiva Eiger on Yoreh De’ah 120:1. |
| 40. |
Tevilat Keilim, p. 130. |
| 41. |
Yoreh De’ah 120:16 in Rema. |
| 42. |
Ibid., Taz sec. 18. |
| 43. |
Shulchan Aruch HaRav, Orach Chaim 323:8. If one was unable to immerse the utensil before a holiday and needs to use it on the holiday, see ibid., 509:15. |
| 44. |
Code of Jewish Law, Yoreh De’ah 120:16, and Taz sec. 18. |
| 45. |
Likkutei Sichot, vol. 18, pp. 369–370. But see there, p. 364, that Noda B’Yehuda (Shivat Tziyon 11) and Chatam Sofer (Orach Chaim 109) maintain that immersion is necessary in this case. In their opinion, therefore, the sale of chametz should include only the chametz in the utensils, and not the utensils themselves. |
When the owner of the utensil is a non-Jew, it is sufficient for the utensil to be kashered, for us to eat from it. No immersion is needed.
In fact, immersing it in the Mikvah would be pointless since it is still in a state of potential impurity - at any time the owner may choose to use if for non-kosher food.
(We hope the mashgiach of the restaurant will inform us if he does so.)
Surfside, Fl
This is a good question.
Generally, the sages only allow loopholes to be used if they do not conflict with the spirit of the law.
E.g. We sell Chametz and buy it back after Pesach. This is in line with the spirit of Pesach since we seal all of this Chametz away thus ensuring we will not eat from it. (In addition, we don't technically own it.)
The pupose of immersing vessles is to purify it from the impurity of being used or potentially used for non-kosher foods. Immersing the utensil in the mikvah is a ritual act which reinforces in our mind the importance of keeping ourslves and our posessions "kosher" in practice and in potential.
When the utensil cannot be immersed, we need to take a different action in order to reinforce this concept. By giving it away and borrowing it back we are teaching oursleves that we should keep a distancefrom anything that is even remotely impure.
Surfside, Fl
Henderson, NV.
cc, fl
Surfside, Fl
Camarillo, CA