Contact Us

Three Divine Echoes: Singularity, Plurality and Oneness

Three Divine Echoes: Singularity, Plurality and Oneness


Hear O Israel, the L‑rd our G‑d, the L‑rd is one (“echad”)

Deuteronomy 6:4

We usually think of the cosmic struggle in terms of good versus evil. But according to the Kabbalists, good and evil are but spinoffs of unity and divisiveness. G‑d is the ultimate oneness, and everything G‑dly in our world bears the stamp of His unity. Evil, simply stated, is the distortion of this oneness by the veil of divisiveness in which G‑d shrouds His creation.

Creation, as described in the teachings of Kabbalah, is an evolution from the utterly singular to the plural and dichotomous. The entirety of existence originates as the divine yen to create—a desire as singular as its Conceiver. But latent in this desire is also another face of the divine—the infinite possibilities implicit in G‑d’s unlimited potential. Thus, the singular desire for creation gives birth to our plural world, a world whose immense detail and complexity bespeak the infinite potential of its Creator.

None of this, in and of itself, is the negative phenomenon we call evil. Yet the seeds for evil are here. Plurality begets divisiveness, and divisiveness begets conflict. As long as a plural reality still echoes its singular source, divisiveness will not take root and spawn strife; but with the development of each particular entity in the diversity of creation into a self that is distinct of the cosmic whole, divisiveness/strife/evil rears its head.

Dissecting Life

How does one restore the divine unity to a fragmented world? By delving even further into its plurality.

For such is the paradox of life: the more something is broken down to its particulars, the more we uncover opportunities for unity.

Take, for example, two physical substances. Your five senses perceive them as different and unconnected; but place them under a microscope and you will discover that they are comprised of similar components—they might even share an element or two. The deeper you delve, descending to the molecular, atomic, and subatomic levels, the more unanimity you will find—and the more ways you will discover to harness these diverse substances toward a singular end.

Or take two nations. On the surface, their goals and aspirations run counter to each other, giving rise to conflict and strife. But dissect these goals, item by item, and you will inevitably find areas in which they overlap and complement each other. This common ground may cover but five percent of each nation’s collective will, but a beachhead of harmony has been achieved. Delve deeper yet, and this beachhead can be expanded. Explore the inner workings of each individual of each nation’s millions, and the countless particulars of each individual’s will, and additional areas of common interest and mutual dependency will come to light. The differences will remain, but instead of fueling strife, they will serve as the building blocks of harmonious coexistence.

Thus we introduce a new factor into the cosmic equation: harmony. We evolve from the ultimate singularity to plurality to diversity, but diversity need not disintegrate into strife. Instead, the diversity can be further dissected into the ingredients of harmony—a harmony that mirrors the singularity out of which the entire process was born.

The Investment

A harmonious world, however, does more than reflect the tranquil singularity of its origins; it reaches beyond it to uncover a new, hitherto unexpressed, face of the divine reality. Life on earth is more than the endeavor to come full circle, to undo creation by restoring its primordial unity. The descent from singularity into diversity is an investment, and (like any self-respecting investor) G‑d expects to realize a profit from His outlay. The profit is harmony, which is a deeper, truer expression of the divine unity than the pre-creation singularity.

If there is one phrase that encapsulates the Jewish faith, it is the Shema, the verse recited by the Jew every morning and evening of his life, and the last words to issue from his dying lips: “Hear O Israel, the L‑rd is our G‑d, the L‑rd is one.” But why, ask our sages, does the verse employ the Hebrew word echad (“one”) to connote G‑d’s unity? The word “one” can also be used to refer to something that is one of a series (as in “one, two, three . . .”), or to something composed of several components (as in “one loaf of bread,” “one human being,” “one community”). G‑d’s unity transcends such “oneness,” as Maimonides states in the opening chapter of his Mishneh Torah. Would not the Hebrew word yachid (“singular,” “only one”) have been more appropriate?

But singularity is a challengeable oneness, a oneness that may be obscured by the emergence of plurality. As we have seen, when G‑d’s infinite potential is expressed in the countless particulars of a diverse creation, this results in a concealment of His oneness. The life-endeavor of the Jew is to effect a truer expression of G‑d’s oneness—the oneness of echad. Echad is the oneness of harmony: not a oneness which negates plurality (and which plurality therefore obscures), but a oneness that employs plurality as the implement of unity.

Three Divine Echoes

Ultimately, the unknowable, indefinable essence of G‑d transcends and embraces both singularity and plurality. Neither description—by virtue of its being a description—can be attributed to Him; nor can either be dis-attributed to Him, since, ultimately, a dis-attribution would be as much a definition (that is, the identification of areas to which His reality does or does not extend) as an attribution.

So our reality cannot—indeed, no reality can—express His quintessential truth. But it can express certain elements of it, elements His truth includes by virtue of its non-definitive all-inclusiveness. Three such elements find expression in the various stages of creation:

a) G‑d’s singularity—expressed in the featureless, objectless reality that precedes, transcends and pervades creation.

b) His infinite potential—expressed in the vastly particular world He created.

c) The divine harmony we manifest by effecting a synthesis and unanimity of purpose in G‑d’s diverse creation.

Of the three, harmony is the deepest expression of G‑d’s truth. For its echad-oneness embraces the polar phenomena of singularity and plurality, expressing the truth that the divine reality cannot be confined to either mode of being.

When man, confronted with a fragmented and strife-torn world, responds by extracting the potential for harmony implicit therein, he elevates creation beyond its surface plurality, beyond even its singular origins, fashioning it into a model of the quintessential unity of its Creator.

Based on the Chassidic discourse Heichaltzu 5659 by Rabbi Shalom DovBer of Lubavitch; adaptation by Yanki Tauber.

© Copyright, all rights reserved. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with's copyright policy.
Join the Discussion
Sort By:
1000 characters remaining
Danny Blackman Tracy, CA/US August 9, 2011

Good & evil I'm a simple man so I see good and evil in simpler terms which is that G-d is Holy and without Him in our lives good and evil is subjective. Which explains why people and the world is the way it is.

May we all be counted worthy as we turn our hearts and minds to Him. Reply

ruth housman marshfield hills, ma August 9, 2011

the mystery of the alef If you look at the Alef you will see it closely resembles the symbolic representation of what is above, and what is below, as separated by the diagonal. If you say the word ALEF to yourself you might hear, as I do, ALL EFF.
When I look at the English letter F I see a KEY. And when we use words like ineffable, we are surely referring to what is to be divined, as in the Divine, and within you hear the EFF again.

The division of the Alef also references I believe the dichotomy of good and evil, which is surely an apparent dichotomy but the two do fold together, as you have explicated, so beautifully, as unity. It is hard to live on this plane and see this, because we are felled by tragedy, and yet... and yet, there seems to be a supernal story that does somehow fold all of this into the One.

The word FLOCK contains then contains LOCK AND KEY. There are keys within analysis of the Hebrew letters, and they are endlessly astounding.

Babel itself I believe means GATE in Sanskrit. Reply

levi l brooklyn , ny usa March 31, 2011

Thanks Yanky and Shankins very well explains and nice comment's Reply

Shankin Media , PA October 31, 2010

Tower of Babel This was the problem with the Tower of Babel. The people of "devarim achadim" tried to "come full circle, to undo creation by restoring its primordial unity." Like the flood - the undoing of the division between the waters - the tower threatened to undo creation. This would short-circuit the process by which creation could achieve maturity. It would shortcut the unity of complexity with the unity of simplicity.

Once the flood is permanently over, and once the people of devarim achadim have been dispersed, it is time to begin the work of real relationship between the divine and the human: Abraham and Sarah. Relationship is the unity of complexity, and that is what G-d seeks with a person, with a family, and finally with a nation.

In the Zohar, it says that the Israelites at the Sea sang the Shirah using "devarim achadim". That was a moment in which the true unity of the divine existed for a moment on earth. A re-creation? Reply

brian amarillo, tx July 24, 2010

harmony How good and pleasant it is when brothers live together in harmony. Reply

Anonymous Bayside, CA July 22, 2010

Very interesting article. Thanks for writing this. I never thought of the world working in this way. Reply

LANCE LONWGE Durban, south africa August 12, 2009

three divine echoes i am an african young man who find religion interesting and always fascinated by how jews and muslims lead their way of life. this article just blew my mind and looking forward to visitng your site regularly. Reply

S brooklyn July 31, 2009

WOW What a nice explenation of the theology of the Alter Rebbe. Reply

Related Topics
This page in other languages