Here's a great tip:
Enter your email address and we'll send you our weekly magazine by email with fresh, exciting and thoughtful content that will enrich your inbox and your life, week after week. And it's free.
Oh, and don't forget to like our facebook page too!
Contact Us

How Can the Commentaries All Be Right?

How Can the Commentaries All Be Right?



I bought a set of Torah and the Prophets with all the classic commentaries and I enjoy studying it very much. I am unsure, however, how to understand the vast differences of opinions concerning any particular story. Often, the opinions contradict one another.

How can I appreciate studying such commentaries when only one could be right?


This is a commonly asked question. It is predicated on the assumption that the purpose of the Torah is to tell us the history of our people, and history had to happen in a certain way.

But that isn't the purpose of the Torah. True, it is stories that fill much of the Torah. And true, these episodes literally happened in a specific manner. Nonetheless, when studying the Torah, we are meant to go past "what happened" and view the stories as a means for G‑d to convey us a message—a lesson for our lives right now.

Indeed, one needs look no further than the very translation of the word "Torah" to realize that the Torah is not a mere guide to Jewish history. Torah means "teaching"—not "history book." This is also apparent from the Torah's (seemingly strange) selective history, the occasional non-chronological order in which events are recorded, and the mysterious wording it sometimes uses to tell a story.

For, beyond the storyline, each story, verse, word, and letter in the Torah is a glimpse into a higher truth. It is the infinite wisdom of G‑d concentrated into stories the human mind can comprehend.

This truth can be observed from four primary dimensions, called pshat (simple), remez (hint), drush (seek) and sod (secret). And there are countless avenues of understanding within each of these perspectives.

Pshat is the simple interpretation of the Torah, following the smoothest, most elegant path of words and context. Remez uncovers the hints and allegoric meaning behind these words. Drush (or midrash) seeks the deeper meaning of the verse. And sod is the esoteric, mystical part of Torah, the meaning that can only be known to those who have been told. Read this article for more about these four, with examples of each of them.

When our holy commentators studied a story in the Torah, they each noticed another aspect of this truth. And so, we treasure them all.

And if you will ask, "So which one is true? Which one really happened?"—the answer, quite simply, is that all are true, all really happened.

Why is it difficult for us to swallow that? Because we believe that there is only one reality, and so only one history. The Torah, however, knows of many realities, all of them true, each of them containing a different lesson for us in this reality now. There are worlds where pshat is real—different worlds for different pshatim. Then there are worlds of remez, of drush and of sod.

For example, in our physical world, Moses may have been say, six feet tall. But in a certain world of drash, he was 10 amot—about 15 feet tall. Which one is more true? That depends: Are you looking for his height or for his stature? Are you measuring the Moses that fit into a physical body in a physical world, or are you measuring the real Moses, the soul and true character of the man–so that you will know how to relate to him and appreciate his character?

A stature of 10 amot implies that this person is complete in every way—since there are 10 aspects of the human character. That's who Moses really was—a whole and balanced person in the ultimate sense of those words. Our physical world cannot handle a human being of those proportions, and so we see the truth in a poise of compromise. But in a world that does not have our physical limitations, Moses is actually 10 amot tall.

It all has to do with what we are taking from the story, what we need to learn. And each different approach to Torah will provide another lesson, all equally valuable, all equally true.

Rabbi Yeshaya Horowitz presents and discusses the classic views concerning the study of Midrash in Shnei Luchot Habrit, Torah Shebaal Peh, 17 (Klal Hadrushim). He refers there to the idealist perspective in Torah that he presents ibid, Toldot Adam, Bayit Acharon. The concept is based upon the words of Rabbi Menachem Azaria of Fano in Assara Maamarot, Maamar Chikur Din, 3:22.
Rabbi Yisroel Cotlar is a Chabad rabbi in Cary, North Carolina. He is also a member of the Ask the Rabbi team.
Image: Detail from a work by chassidic artist Shoshannah Brombacher. To view or purchase Ms Brombacher's art, click here
© Copyright, all rights reserved. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with's copyright policy.
Join the Discussion
Sort By:
1000 characters remaining
suzy hander woodland hills, ca March 23, 2014

G-d hopes we keep His Commandments. I think He knows this is very hard for some, easier for others. Since Passover is next month, I want to review each one. Is there a deeper meaning into each one that I will never understand? Reply

Yisroel Cotlar Cary, NC February 4, 2010

Re: For more on the ten sefiros, see The Sefirot. Reply

Daniel Ben-Yisrael February 3, 2010

A Torah for Every Jew I believe the the Rebbe, of blessed memory taught in the name of the Arizal that the Torah was given to every jew and as such each jew possess within him/herself a unique interpretation of Torah. Reply

Maria Redmond, WA February 3, 2010

10 aspects of the human character Love reading this section. The article mentions there are 10 aspects of the human character. Please enlighten me, What are they?

Is there a previous article, that discusses this. I'm relatively new here, and any response will be very helpful. Thanks. Reply

Marjorie Upstate NY January 15, 2010

I especially like that example of math study, as a way to understand the nature of Torah study. Because many of us would say that math is black and white, one right answer and all the other wrong answers. Thanks for the reminder, RIck, that even in math, 2 diametrically opposed answers can be "correct".

Also, with Torah, if many interpretations can be true, this can remind us that our own ponderings about a parshah, a word, a single letter, might also have some value.

This is approximately my ninth year of reading the parshah and commentary virtually every week. As you might imagined, this has helped me discover that the new questions and sudden realizations do seem to have no end. Reply

Rick - A Noahide State College, PA December 30, 2009

Torah and Math The way I see the Torah is the same as I see Math: both are perfect, but you need solid proofs of this perfection. In math, most problems have completely different solutions. An example is the square root of 25. which has to completely opposite answers: 5 and -5. So does this mean that math is not perfect? No! Its just saying that there's more than one solution to a particular problem. Depending the circumstances, one answer will be better than the next one.

Same way with the Torah. Sometimes we read the commentaries and they seem to completely contradict each other. This seems to imply that someone or something is wrong: It does not. It simply means (like the square root of 25) that the same problem has many different solutions (or commentaries) and (just like in math) they are all correct.

Each answer or commentary will simply fit better depending the different circumstances that arises. It doesn't not mean that the Torah contradicts itself or its wrong. Reply

Related Topics