HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org - Torah, Judaism and Jewish Info Mitzvahs & Traditions
 
Chabad.org » Mitzvahs & Traditions » More Mitzvahs & Traditions » May I Shake the Lady’s Hand?
PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment10 Comments

May I Shake the Lady’s Hand?


Those of us of а certain, unspecified age may recall what our mothers taught us. We were to offer our seats to ladies and the elderly on streetcars. Gentlemen were to tip their hats, and to remove them in elevators. We were to hold doors for ladies, the elderly and the infirm. And we were taught to shake hands. Be brief. Don't pump. Grasp the hand, but do not crush it. And not like a dead fish.

When one gentleman met another, regardless of whether they knew each other, they were to shake hands. We were taught that a gentleman did not shake hands with a lady, unless she extended her hand first.

And then we learned that these rules did not apply in the world of traditional Jewry.

People of the opposite gender do not even touch each otherThe practice of the traditional Jew is different. The rule is that people of the opposite gender do not even touch each other, let alone shake hands, unless they are husband and wife, siblings, or children with parents and grandparents.

What is the rationale for the Jewish prohibition on men and women touching, let alone shaking hands?

The prohibition of touching (in Hebrew negiah) goes back to the Book of Leviticus (18:6 and 18:19) and was developed further in the Talmud. A person who observes this prohibition is often called a shomer negiаh. It applied not only to close contact such as hugging and kissing, but also to shaking hands or patting on the back. The practice is generally followed by traditionally observant Jews, both men and women, including Hassidic Jews, and those who are referred to as Haredim. It is also observed within the Modern Orthodox community depending on how traditional the person is.

The Question is: Why?

To remove any myths, it can be said emphatically that it has nothing to do with impurity, or with the social or religious status of people who encounter other people.

The reason is a rather complex, even Freudian rationale. It is felt that touching a person of the opposite gender is essentially a sexual act, or at least the precursor of a sexual act. While it is true that most handshakes between men and women do not lead to sexual relations and are not even contemplated, sexual relations always begin with touching. It is also true that a handshake does communicate feelings albeit on a superficial level.

It has been recognized however, that there are many instances in which men and women can and perhaps even should, touch each other. This would apply to saving a person who is facing a life-threatening danger. Members of the health professions may obviously touch members of the opposite gender in the practice of their discipline, as may hairdressers or physical therapists as a necessary component in the practice of theirs.

The issue that seems to have caused the most discussion is whether there is an exception to the prohibition in a business situation. Some commentators take the position that where shaking hands is in a business context, and is clearly a non-affectionate contact, it is permissible under Jewish law (Наlасhаh). The Office of Career Services at Yeshiva University, which is considered Modern Orthodox, takes this position as part of the interview process for its students applying for jobs after graduation. Haredim and Hassidic commentators do not agree.

Traditional Judaism regards touching as a highly sensual actSome commentators would allow the handshake only when one person offers their hand. Here the rationale is that to refuse to reciprocate would embarrass that person which would be wrong. Rabbi Harvey Belovski of Golders Green Synagogue in London describes this position as being that of a respected minority, but not that of the majority of halachic experts. People who describe themselves as shоmеr negiah would not shake hands even in a business context. In their view, in our society where people are trained to appreciate cultural and religious differences, a short explanation would prevent anyone from feeling embarrassed.

Traditional Judaism, unlike some other faiths, regards touching as a highly sensual act. It takes the view that it is not only an important part of marital relations, but one that is only permitted in those relations. To shake hands as a casual courtesy and nothing more is the first step leading to the desensitization of sensuality between husband and wife.

Rabbi Baruch Emmanuel Erdstein of Safed, who holds a degree in anthropology from the University of Michigan, states that "the casual touching of members of the opposite gender can only dull our sensitivity to the sexual power of touch."

А Further Thought

Quite apart from the sexual analysis of some commentators, some commentators point out that an individual's body is personal, and at times to even touch is an intrusion into one's personal dignity. According to this approach, a man should not touch a woman, nor a woman touch a man, out of respect for the space of each other as individuals—especially individuals of the opposite gender who should reserve a certain level of privacy with respect to each other.

Even if both parties wish to touch, or shake hands, that act is still going beyond the bounds of what should be respected.

This concept is also evidenced with regards to touching someone (even of the same gender) for whom one has a great deal of respect. For that reason, when the late Rebbe of Chabad was alive, his followers did not shake his hand.

This practice is not unique to Judaism. When a Texas politician put his hand on the shoulder of Prince Charles, the Prince of Wales, who was visiting the USA, it was regarded as a highly improper social faux-pas. It was not because the Prince was the politician's "better," but because it showed a lack of respect for the prince not only as a visitor, but as the visiting representative of another country. A similar incident took place not long ago in Europe when the American president placed his hands on the shoulders of the lady Chancellor of Germany. This was considered disrespectful towards her, both as the representative of another nation and as an individual.

The key is respectTraditional Judaism translates the showing of respect for the personal space of members of the opposite gender into the social practice of not shaking hands. The key is not the shaking of hands. The key is respect. If we once again offered seats to ladies and opened doors for each other, we may have a more sensitive, kinder and respectful society. Far better than shaking hands.

PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment10 Comments

By Lorne Rozovsky   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author
Lorne E. Rozovsky is a Lawyer, author, educator, a health management consultant and an inquisitive Jew. He could be contacted via his web site rozovsky.com.

The author wishes to thank Rabbi Mendel Samuels of Chabad of the Valley, Simsbury, CT and Rabbi Dovid Zаklikowski of Chabad.org for their assistance.

The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 

Reader Comments
Latest Comments:
Posted: Sep 11, 2011
Perspective on touching
I think that there needs to be a bit of perspective on the issue of minor touching; It was not unknown 40 years ago for an English reverend to kiss female congregants on the cheek- similar to the vicar. I'm sure that the right wingers today would deny this, but at the time no one thought it represented the destruction of civilization; there were people in England who were obesrvant and they were capable of putting things in their righfull place: a kiss on the cheek is not- never has been- sexual; if you think it is then perhaps by extension talking to a beautiful person may cause excitement; but, of course, the fanatics have stamped out that through separate seating: Yosef was a flame; he went out and made things happen; he fled before potential sin, but he wasn't totally removed from it; a person has free will; Yosef exercised it at the vital moment; are we to criticise him for even getting to that moment?
Posted By jjm115, boston, us

Posted: Aug 16, 2011
Greeting mourner at memorial gathering
How do I express sympathy at memorial gathering at Chabad House to an observant acquaintance whose wife died a month ago. What is an acceptable expression.
Posted By Anonymous, Monterey, Ca

Posted: Aug 8, 2010
Becoming Shomer Negiah...
I was raised in a non-religious home but have become very much more observant than most people I interact with both personally and professionally. My husband also grew up the same way. However, I find it important to be shomer negiah (observant of the law prohibiting contact between unmarried individuals of opposite genders) and am working to explain it to the people in my life that are not religious or Jewish. 99% of the people I interact with respect me and my beliefs. Thank G-d.
Posted By Mrs. Sara Menashe

Posted: Feb 11, 2010
Jewish "fences"
I recall a rabbi explaining why we are not to touch the menorah on Chanukah. "It is a fence", he said. If we do not get close to the menorah we cannot accidentally snuff the candles." I think of these fences a lot. A few months ago many people I knew substituted the bumping of elbows for handshakes, even in semi-formal situations, to slow the spread of H1N1. This seemed a bit odd to me because we were also told to cough or sneeze into our elbows. In any case, this new form of greeting was somewhat fun, and certainly caused no arousal, although it did look like the Chicken Dance. In my view a courteous bow in one of many styles is as good as a handshake, and perhaps casual skin contact has gone too far for many reasons. Am I too much like the neighbour in Frost's ironic poem "Mending Wall?
Posted By Gary Davis

Posted: Feb 8, 2010
of rules and "rulers"
I woke in the night and there is, echoic,, in the English word OF, the Hebrew word AV, meaning Father, or FATHER, depending on whether we are referencing our father or OUR Father. Now LOVE itself the word, contains that echo. that echoic connect with AV.

I believe that love breaks all the rules. And yes, I understand this article was about explicating a rule espoused by the very Orthodox.

People have many ways of being
Diversity is certainly the key.

I think, in commenting on this article, we do this thing called Midrash, which is about the interpretation of rules and what they mean.

I do deeply believe that women should be respected, that they are equals with men, and that there is a deep wisdom and love to be shared, that perhaps should be not in avoidance but in being seen.

Eye contact is a way of paying respect and lack of eye contact and eschewing that human touch could be viewed as being cold, distant, and also better than. We do parse out meaning from our inter actions.
Posted By ruth housman, marshfield hills, ma

Posted: Feb 7, 2010
works for me
For as many people who don't want to be touched, outside Chabad and Orthodoxy in North America, there are those who do because it is a feeling of warmth acceptance without sexual undertones or other impediment.
It is okay for you to hold your opinion. I respect it. The same respect should be shown to me, although not incumbent upon you. If i have missed the point of the article, i am sorry. It has not changed what i have written for my own manners/standards.
Posted By Anonymous, wc

Posted: Feb 6, 2010
Author's Response
The comments posted on Feb. 4 and 5 miss the point. The article does not promote the practice of not touching. It discusses the various explanations for it. It takes the position however, that the issue is not one of the role of men and women in modern society. It has to do with respect for other people. It does take the position that it is irrelevant how the person who initiates the touching feels. It does not matter that as one reader said, " It works for me." Respect has to do with how the other person feels, not how we feel. Many people, both men and woman, no matter how emancipated, do not like to be touched for whatever reason. Surely we should have respect for them and not make assumptions based on our own feelings and our own views of society. To ignore women because they are women in order to avoid touching them is hardly a sign of respect for them as people.
Posted By Lorne Rozovsky, Bloomfield, CT, USA

Posted: Feb 5, 2010
a handshake in friendship
Maybe there are rules that are meant to be broken and maybe some rules should be retired, as in retiring from the shaking of hands and that human touch, is the possibility of offense to the other person, and also a kind of disdain that is so often felt, by the avoidance even of eye contact that I have observed among the ultra Orthodox men with women.

God created man and woman and God created the need to support, love, and exhibit that love, that is not necessarily sexual. I believe that forms of affection are not wrong and that there is a kind of coldness and cold analysis that talks about these "rules" as if they are so cast in stone.

Sadly, some Orthodox men do not care for their women, and it's very clear that LOVE is the crux of the matter, and love itself includes warmth and genuine feeling and that is so often the healing "touch". I am thinking to study about Torah should involve a heart felt understanding of heart and soul and to communicate this is about love itself.
Posted By ruth housman, marshfield hills, ma

Posted: Feb 5, 2010
okay
You are welcome to your views. In Chabad quarters I do not shake hands and pretty well just ignore women as rhe easiest protocol.
Outside Chabad I shake hands with women as is the acceptable norm. This whole Freudain thing is not for me. It is very easy to make the women whose hand you have shaken very comfortable. You can talk about the wife you adore and your wonderful children. Or any other number of ways that are sociably accepted.
This is not an argument. It is an opinion. It works for me. I also hug or lightly kiss a woman on the cheek. It has never presented a problem for me. Not doing so is awkward for me.
Respectfully submitted.
Posted By Anonymous

Posted: Feb 4, 2010
The evolution of societal roles
One of the most obvious changes in the roles of men and women in modern (western) societies is a breaking away from the traditional roles of men and women. Formerly, only men had a role in the public world: in business, politics, and even in most areas of culture. Women were for having children and managing the home. They also sewed garments and shopped and schlepped food from the market. And they were "sex objects," whether as wives, for private enjoyment, or as public prostitutes, dancers and entertainers.
Now women have careers, fight wars, and manage corporations; men often play a greater role in child-rearing than previously. Those who (Jewish or not), in maintaining that shaking hands with women is a sexual act, run counter to the larger (evolved) society. Women are people. We should treat them as full-fledged human beings, or as Kant put it, as ends in themselves, rather than as objects, sexual or otherwise. Let's give progress a hand.

Posted By Michael B. Smith, Riverdale, NY/USA



 


More Mitzvahs & Traditions
Expand The Laws of Challah
The Laws of Challah
Expand The Traveler’s Companion
The Traveler’s Companion
Dedicating a New Torah Scroll
Jews and Shoes
It's About Time
Hand Signs of the Jew
Kapparot: The Chicken Thing
The Mysteries of Shaatnez
Abi Gezunt! "Be Healthy!"
The Kippah (Skullcap)
Bringing Back the Wimpel
What is an Eruv?
Raise Your Hand If You’re A Kohen
May I Shake the Lady’s Hand?
Showing 21 - 34 of 34