The first mitzvah that is performed on a Jewish baby boy is the mitzvah of circumcision. In Hebrew this is called brit milah (lit., “the covenant of circumcision”). This mitzvah is referred to, in the blessing recited by the father at the circumcision, as “the covenant of Abraham,” as it was to Abraham that G‑d commanded1: “This is My covenant, which you shall observe between Me and between you and your seed after you, that every male among you be circumcised.”
Many reasons are given for this mitzvah. Several of them are:
Several reasons are given as to why the Torah commands us9 to wait until the eighth day before performing the circumcision. (Though these may be part of the reason, ultimately we do it on the eighth day—not earlier or later [unless medically necessary, see below]—because this is what G‑d commanded.)
Some of them are:
We do not wait beyond the eighth day, because it will be more difficult for the parents to do this to their baby as he grows older. In addition, the older the boy is, the more painful the procedure becomes. And, as explained above, the number eight has special spiritual significance.19
G‑d made thirteen covenants with Abraham concerning the brit milah.20 Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Liadi explains21 that this indicates that the brit milah evokes the revelation of G‑d’s Thirteen Attributes of Mercy.
Despite Abraham’s great devotion to observing the mitzvot of the Torah, he was not called tamim—“complete”22—until after his brit milah.23
Our sages go as far as to say that if not for this mitzvah, G‑d would not have created the heavens and earth;24 it is the greatest of the positive mitzvot;25 and considered the equivalent to all of the mitzvot of the Torah combined.26
According to some opinions, Abraham circumcised himself on Yom Kippur. In that merit, every year on Yom Kippur, G‑d “sees” the blood of Abraham, and forgives the sins of the Jewish people.27
One whose father did not circumcise him and who, upon reaching adulthood, willfully never circumcises himself, is punished by having his soul cut off from its divine source (karet). As the verse states37: “And an uncircumcised male, who will not circumcise the flesh of his foreskin, that soul will be cut off from its people; he has broken My covenant.”38 This is one of only two positive commandments whose neglect carries this punishment. The other is the Paschal sacrifice.39
The Talmud says the Jewish women are considered naturally circumcised.40 This means that they do not have to go through this painful mitzvah in order to achieve all of the objectives of the brit (outlined above). For them, these are inborn traits.
Click here for Part II of this article—The Timing and the Preparations.
| FOOTNOTES | |
| 1. | |
| 2. |
Maimonides, Guide for the Perplexed 3:49. |
| 3. |
Commentary of Sforno to Genesis 17:11,13. |
| 4. |
Mitzvah no. 2. |
| 5. |
Sforno, ibid. |
| 6. |
Ibid. |
| 7. |
On Genesis 17:9. |
| 8. |
Sefer HaChinuch, ibid. |
| 9. | |
| 10. |
Maimonides, Guide for the Perplexed 3:49. |
| 11. |
Talmud, Niddah 31b. |
| 12. |
See Leviticus 12:2. |
| 13. |
Zohar 3:91b. |
| 14. |
See Ohr Hachaim commentary on Leviticus, ibid. |
| 15. |
Likkutei Torah, Vayikra 20c ff. |
| 16. |
In Kabbalistic language, this is the level of Adam Kadmon. |
| 17. |
See Kli Yakar commentary to Leviticus 9:1. |
| 18. |
Shabbat, which is on the seventh day, is a manifestation of the lower aspect of G‑dliness. For this reason, a brit that is on time (the eighth day) supersedes the observance of Shabbat. |
| 19. |
Maimonides, ibid. |
| 20. |
Talmud, Nedarim 31b, based on the fact that the word brit—“covenant”—appears thirteen times in the verses of Genesis 17 in reference to this mitzvah. |
| 21. |
Torah Ohr, Lech Lecha 13d. |
| 22. | |
| 23. |
Rabbi [Judah the Prince] in Talmud, Nedarim 32a. |
| 24. |
Nedarim, ibid. |
| 25. |
Code of Jewish Law, Yoreh De’ah 260. |
| 26. |
Nedarim, ibid. |
| 27. |
Pirkei d’Rabbi Eliezer, ch. 29. |
| 28. |
Commentary of Rabbeinu Bechayei to Genesis 17:24. |
| 29. |
Unless the person sinned exceedingly or profaned the covenant (Talmud, Eruvin 19a). |
| 30. |
Genesis Rabbah 48:8. |
| 31. |
Ibid. 46:10. |
| 32. |
Brian J. Morris, “Why Circumcision is a Biomedical Imperative for the 21st Century,” BioEssays 29:11 (November 2007), 1147–1158. |
| 33. |
Observing this mitzvah throughout one’s life means not defiling this holy organ with any forbidden sexual activity. This includes not to waste seed, and to sanctify oneself during intercourse (See Code of Jewish Law, Orach Chaim 240). Since man’s sexual desire is very strong, it is difficult to observe this mitzvah to perfection. It is for this reason that proper observance of this mitzvah is equivalent to observing the entire Torah (Me’am Loez on Genesis, ibid.). |
| 34. |
Talmud, Menachot 43b; see there for a story in this vein about King David. See Likkutei Sichot 3:757ff, as to why this is a continuous mitzvah. |
| 35. |
Me’am Loez, ibid., citing Shelah. |
| 36. |
Zohar 3:91b. See also Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Liadi’s Code of Jewish Law, Orach Chaim 4:2 (mahadura batra). |
| 37. | |
| 38. |
According to Rema (Code of Jewish Law, Yoreh De’ah 261:1), the person becomes liable for this punishment every day he doesn’t circumcise himself. |
| 39. |
Sefer HaChinuch, mitzvah no. 2. |
| 40. |
Rabbi Yochanan in Avodah Zarah 27a; see Beur HaGra, Yoreh De’ah 264:2. |
1. Nedarim 20a, in which the man is permitted to speak during relations with his wife for the purpose of arousal
2. Kallah 19, citation of Rabbi Judah
3. not Talmud, but writings of Joseph ben Abraham Gikatilla, on how to ensure the conception of a male child (through pleasing the wife)
From this you can assume a man is urged to please his wife. Pleasure is therefore more important for the female, and restraint is more important for the male. I guess this discussion about circumcision does support that interpretation.
Berlin, Germany
Doesn't forbidding pleasing oneself based on such a liberal interpretation violate the very clear and distinct law from Deut 4:2 not to add or delete laws? Doesn't that go beyond building a fence around the Torah and instead create resentment and guilt for those who are not married?
Thank you
Denver
2) As to why the circumcision is in the lower half of the body, the message is that as a result of the of our dedication to G-d, we must master over this aspect of ourselves as well. The symbolism also indicates that this dedication is passed on to the next generation.
3) In terms of sexual pleasure vs. deprivation, the issue is not man vs. woman but self vs. other. Each spouse should try to give their partner a pleasurable experience and should do so in as frequently as that spouse desires it (if possible). On the other hand, one should not seek to pleasure themselves as this is not spiritually beneficial. See Code of Jewish Law, Orach Chayim Siman 240 in this regard.
Surfside, Fl
In terms of pleasing a woman, I think the Talmud only talks of sexual frequency. Please cite the tractate if it says anything else.
Thank you.
Berlin, Germany
On the other hand, there is a debate that circumcison does reduce pleasure. It's not conclusive but it centers on this: "the genitally intact male has thousands of fine touch receptors and other highly erogenous nerve endings—many of which are lost to circumcision, with an inevitable reduction in sexual sensation experienced by circumcised males."
This would be in line with Rambam's speculation: that G-d commanded us to be circumcised to reduce sexual pleasure so that we wouldn't behave as animals. The whole idea of "Kadosh" or "holy" is to separate us from our animal nature so the Rambam might be on to something.
Thank you
Berlin, Germany
The Talmud says that after the circumcision, the Mohel must suck out some blood in order to prevent infection. This is called Metzitza. The Talmud also says that any Mohel who doesn't do Metzitza is removed from his position (becuase he's endangering the child). Even when modern medicine questioned the necessity of Metzitza, the clear majority of Halachic Authorities insisted that a traditional metzitza remains an obligation. The Metzitza also has Kabbalistic ramifications. In light of a recent tragic story, a small minority of Rabbis are now saying that Metzitza should only be done with a tube or a machine & not directly by the mouth. Despite this, the traditional Mohels still do Metzitza by the mouth. Generally they use an alchoholic mouthwash before doing it, so that any germs in his mouth are killed. All of the opinions on this topic are beyond the scope of this article (or this comment). So one should consult with a Halachic expert on this matter when choosing a Mohel.
Surfside, Fl
Secondly, a question on last week's article on circumcision: What about Metzitza? Where does that come in?
los angeles, CA