HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org - Torah, Judaism and Jewish Info
 
Chabad.org » Kabbalah Online » Weekly Torah » Archives » Devarim - Deuteronomy » Va'etchanan » The Holy Ari » The Mistake of the Mixed Multitude - Part 1
PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment1 Comment
The Mistake of the Mixed Multitude - Part 1
Kabbalah reveals the spiritual drama between soul-roots.
Advanced Advanced

The Mistake of the Mixed Multitude - Part 1


In this Torah reading, Moses speaks to the Jewish nation:
G-d became angry with me on your account and did not listen to me. G-d said to me, "Enough! Speak to Me no more about this." (Deut. 3:26)

The Mixed Multitude derive from the evil of Moses….

[As we have explained elsewhere,] the Mixed Multitude derive from the evil [aspect] of Moses. They issued prematurely and were not properly rectified [first], so they sinned.

When the Jews, led by Moses, left Egypt, Moses acceded to take along a "mixed multitude" of non-Jews with them. Although his intentions were good, these people had not been fully educated about the ways of Judaism and the path of the Torah, and so they made numerous errors in judgment throughout Israel's trek in the desert, often drawing the Jewish people into their errors as well.

Evil can be defined as consciousness not sufficiently oriented toward and focused on G-d - or, worse, oriented away from or against G-d. Just as with people, who must undergo a selfish period of childhood in order to develop their sense of self before emerging into the mature, adult world, so must any revelation of Divinity, or any soul, undergo a maturation process before it can descend into the world. Although the soul will mature again during its lifetime as it goes through childhood, etc., this is a second stage of development. Thus, to a certain extent, the character of the individual is already developed during its fetal life.

The Mixed Multitude thus reflected this idea of premature introduction into holiness. Insecure in their sense of self, they were not ready to abandon it in favor of the truth to which they were being elevated.

Moses, as a leader, should have known that this was the case. But his acceptance of the Mixed Multitude reflected a weakness on his part, an unwarranted tolerance and acceptance of that which is imperfect and unripe, erroneously allowing it to take part in mature, adult life before its time. (Perhaps this over-fascination with the raw, the untamed, and the immature echoes Isaac's fascination with and preference of Esau over Jacob, as well as modern society's worship and indulgence of youth at the expense of its reverence and appreciation of the wisdom of age.)

G-d did not want to accept these unfit converts. [Had they not joined the Jewish people], there would have been no death or exile, as it is written, "[The tablets were the work of G-d, and the writing was the writing of G-d,] chiseled on the tablets." (Ex. 32:16)

When the Torah was first given, the spiritual impurity caused by the sin of the Tree of Knowledge was removed from the world. Thus, the Hebrew word for "chiseled", "charut", can be interpreted to mean "freedom" (in Hebrew, "cheirut"); the tablets freed the world from the sentence of death and its spiritual analog, exile. (Avot 6:2; Eiruvin 54a; Shemot Rabbah 32:1) The Mixed Multitude, however, perpetrated the sin of the Golden Calf, which reintroduced this impurity or self-orientation into the world.

But Moses accepted them, thinking that it would be good to absorb them into holiness.

This way, Moses reasoned, their unrefined power could be harnessed for holy purposes. Their desire to join the Jewish people seemed to indicate their readiness for this.

Aspects of his soul return as the leader of each generation in order to rectify the spiritual heirs of the Mixed Multitude….

[He] especially [wanted to accept them] because they were somewhat important to him, as it is written "the people in whose midst I am" (Num. 11:21), and "the people at your feet" (Ex. 11:8). Thus, he sought to rectify them. But on the contrary, they ruined Israel, as it written, "Go, descend, for your people who you brought up out of Egypt have corrupted..." (ibid. 32:7). It does not say "have been corrupted" but "have corrupted", meaning, "have corrupted others," i.e. Israel.

In this verse, the verb "corrupt" is transitive. Furthermore, G-d tells Moses about his people, that he, not G-d, brought up out of Egypt, referring to the Mixed Multitude.

Moses therefore had to die, in order to ascend on high and receive G-d's beneficence. There is therefore no generation without [a leader like] Moses.

In order to right the wrong he caused, Moses' trans-generational job is to rectify the ongoing impurity of the Mixed Multitude, until it is fully matured. He therefore belongs spiritually to the pre-redemptive generation of the desert and could not pass over the Jordan river to lead the next generation in the conquest of the Land of Israel. Aspects of his soul return as the leader of each generation in order to rectify the spiritual heirs of the Mixed Multitude.

In order to do this, his soul, each time, has to accrue extra spiritual power, and this it does by staying in the womb of Imma for a longer than usual period, as the Arizal explains in Part 2.


Translated and adapted by Moshe-Yaakov Wisnefsky from Sefer HaLikutim; subsequently published in "Apples From the Orchard."

Reprinted with permission from Chabad of California. Copyright 2004 by Chabad of California, Inc. All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this work or portions thereof, in any form, without permission, in writing, from Chabad of California, Inc.

PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment1 Comment

From the teachings of Rabbi Yitzchak Luria   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author
Rabbi Yitzchak Luria […Ashkenazi ben Shlomo] (5294-5332 = 1534-1572 c.e.); Yahrtzeit (anniversary of death): 5th of Av. Buried in the Old Cemetery of Tzfat. Commonly known as the Ari, an acronym standing for Elo-hi Rabbi Yitzchak, the
G-dly Rabbi Isaac. No other master or sage ever had this extra letter Aleph, standing for Elo-hi [G-dly], prefaced to his name. This was a sign of what his contemporaries thought of him. Later generations, fearful that this appellation might be misunderstood, said that this Aleph stood for Ashkenazi, indicating that his family had originated in Germany, as indeed it had. But the original meaning is the correct one, and to this day among Kabbalists, Rabbi Yitzchak Luria is only referred to as Rabbenu HaAri, HaAri HaKadosh [the holy Ari] or Arizal [the Ari of blessed memory].
Moshe Yaakov Wisnefsky is a scholar, writer, editor and anthologist, living in Jerusalem. He has recently produced two monumental works: "Apples from the Orchard: Arizal on the Weekly Torah" and a Chumash translation with commentary based on the works of the Lubavitcher Rebbe (Kehot).

The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 

Reader Comments
Latest Comments:
Posted: Sep 29, 2011
Mixed Multitudes
The writer of this article is totally wrong about the mixed multitudes. He blames much of the problems with rebellion in the wilderness on non-Jews, when large parts of it came from the leaders of Israel themselves, including Aaron, Miriam, Korah, 10 of the 12 spies and others. Israel did not need others to corrupt them, they did a fine job all on their own. Everywhere they went, it didn't take long before they became dissatisfied with something. And, like the writer himself, they looked for someone else to blame, whether Moses, later on, the prophets, or in this case, the mixed multitude. There was a reason that God brought out the multitude, not Moses. They were to stand in place for those that He would call out of the nations, and accept the covenant and the Torah for them.
Posted By Patrick, Hilliard, FL./USA



 


The Holy Ari
Developing Fetal Consciousness
The Mistake of the Mixed Multitude - Part 1
The Mistake of the Mixed Multitude - Part 2