HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org - Torah, Judaism and Jewish Info
 
Chabad.org » Kabbalah Online » Weekly Torah » Archives » Bamidbar - Numbers » Korach » Mystical Classics » Suspicions About Moses
PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
CommentComment
Advanced Advanced

Suspicions About Moses

Why did the masses disparage Moses?

"Moses heard and fell on his face." (Num. 16:4)

The Talmud asks what it was precisely that Moses had heard (Sanhedrin 110a), and Rabbi Samuel son of Nachmeyni says that he had heard that these people suspected him of committing adultery (Baal HaTurim) since we read in the verse "And they envied Moses in the camp" (Psalms 106:16), which is interpreted by Rabbi Shmuel bar Yitzchak as meaning that each Jewish husband suspected Moses of adultery with his wife, since the Torah had stated that "Moses took his tent and put it up outside the camp" (Ex. 33:7). The question arises that, even granted the Jewish people were sinful, how could they have suspected Moses of adultery?! After all, Miriam had criticized Moses for not even living with his own wife, much less with other husbands' wives! What possible reason could these people have had to suspect Moses of something so patently absurd?

Moses removed his tent to silence these suspicions….

Many commentators have written that this accusation is not to be taken at face value, but rather that the rebels denied the quality of Moses' prophetic insights, claiming that it was not, as stated, of a face-to-face variety as described in Deut. 34:10, i.e. qualitatively superior to the prophetic powers of other prophets. The rebels claimed that the angels by means of whom prophetic images are transmitted are known as "ishim", "men", meaning that they are the means by which humans receive intelligence from celestial sources. The recipient would then be described as "eishet ish", "a married woman", much as a wife describes herself as such, seeing she is the "passive" part of her husband. (Their intention then was to deny Moses his special relationship with G-d).

The Maimonides, in his "Guide for the Perplexed", maintains that the people were protesting Moses' arrogant behavior in claiming special status. I fail to understand how Maimonides, i.e. the Talmud, wants to prove this from the verse in Psalms quoted earlier. The language employed there is one describing "jealousy". This lends more credence to those who understand the accusation leveled against Moses as being meant literally! They were apparently alleging that the reason Moses appointed Aaron and his sons as Priests was to avoid being involved in the procedure of the bitter waters that a wife suspected of infidelity has to drink, seeing the priest was his blood relation and as such unable to administer the procedure.

The quarrel was directed at Aaron. This is why these men reasoned that there must be substance to the people's suspicions. One cannot argue that since Moses had taken his tent out of the camp, this occurred before Aaron ever began his function as a High Priest, seeing that Moses removed his tent on the morrow of the Day of Atonement, when the Tabernacle had not yet existed. It is a fact that as soon as Moses gave instructions to collect materials for the building of the Tabernacle and the weaving of the priests' garments, he had also announced who was to wear those garments, i.e. Aaron and his sons. There were grounds then for the suspicions, and Moses removed his tent to silence these suspicions. This is what Rashi explains there. Now that a quarrel had surfaced these suspicions were voiced openly, and that is why Moses fell on is face when he "heard". This is how one has to explain the plain meaning of the verse.

PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
CommentComment

From Shenei Luchot HaBrit by Rabbi Isaiah Horowitz   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author
Rabbi Isaiah Horowitz b. 5320 (1560 CE) in Prague; d. 5390 (1630 CE) in Jerusalem, where he served as chief rabbi; known as the "Shelah", an acronym from Shnei Luchot HaBrit, his work of commentary and halacha.
Eliyahu Munk, the translator, was born in Frankfurt, emigrated to England as a young man and then to Toronto. After retiring from education and moving to Israel in 1978, he began an extraordinary second career as a translator, publishing English versions of the Torah commentaries of Rebbeinu Bachya, Akeidat Yitzchak, the Shelah, the Alshich and the Ohr Hachayim.

The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 



 


Mystical Classics
The Eternal Covenant
A Cry from the Earth
Suspicions About Moses