HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org - Torah, Judaism and Jewish Info
 
Chabad.org » Kabbalah Online » Weekly Torah » Archives » Vayikra - Leviticus » Shemini » Contemporary Kabbalists » Extreme Incense Offering
PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment1 Comment
Extreme Incense Offering
Only a unique and spontaneous act was capable of truly uniting the world with the Divine.

Extreme Incense Offering


The sons of Aaron, Nadab and Abihu, each took his fire-pan; they placed fire in them and they placed incense on it; they offered before G-d an alien fire that He had not commanded them. Fire came forth from G-d and devoured them; they died before G-d. Moses said to Aaron, "This is what G-d had said, 'I will be sanctified by my near ones, and be glorified before all the people'" and Aaron was silent. (Lev. 10:1-2)

Nadab and Abihu were on a higher spiritual level than Moses and Aaron….

Read simply, this story seems to be about a tragic blunder in the midst of one of the holiest moments of history - a rash sin and a swift punishment. However, several factors suggest otherwise, primarily, Moses' statement in the third verse. In the words of Rashi, quoting the Midrash: "Moses said to Aaron, 'I knew that the Tabernacle would be sanctified by one of G-d's intimates, but I thought it would happen through me or you. Now I see that they are greater than us!'" Nadab and Abihu were on a higher spiritual level than Moses and Aaron; their deed brought about the complete sanctification of the Tabernacle, which was not achieved by their elders.

They were drinking wine to open their minds, to reveal the essence of their souls….

Among the explanations given in the Talmud is that they entered the Tabernacle inebriated. Thus immediately after their death G-d instructs the priests never to enter the Temple with wine on their lips. (This in itself implies that before this instruction it was permitted to drink wine.) Obviously, Aaron's sons were not simply enjoying a drink. They were drinking wine to open their minds, to reveal the essence of their souls. As the sages of the Talmud say, "Wine enters, secrets emerge." (Eruvin 65a)

Wine is also an allusion to the secrets of the Torah, of which they were partaking in large measure. This led to an experience in which they lost all sense of their physical beings, so much so that their souls left their bodies. As Rabbi Chaim ibn Attar explains, in their intense desire to cleave to G-d they continued to rise through spiritual heights even as they felt their souls leaving them. Their death was not a punishment; they died in the same way Moses and Aaron died - with a divine kiss.

"…and they placed incense on it": This is the significance of the incense they offered. The incense was offered on the inner altar, paralleling the inner dimension of the heart: the soul, which is constantly bound up with its Source. As opposed to the animal sacrifices offered on the outer altar, which were about raising the animalistic aspects of the self, the "outer-self", to the level of Divinity - the incense offering dealt with and intensified what was already inside the realm of holiness: the soul's inner bond with G-d. Thus the Hebrew word for the animal sacrifice is "korban", which means "to come close", implying the existence of one who is not close who merely comes close but does not become one with G-d. The Hebrew word for "incense", "ketoret", also means "bound", implying that its practitioner is already one with his Source.

A commandment is only necessary for an individual who is outside the divine reality….

"…that he had not commanded": Nadab and Abihu took the incense experience to the extreme. They reached a state of oneness with G-d wherein they were no longer a separate entity from Him, cleaving to Him. They achieved a oneness that gave them an intuitive knowledge of Divine Will. Thus they offered an offering "that He had not commanded", for a commandment is only necessary for an individual who is outside the divine reality. They reached a level of oneness that granted them awareness of the Divine Will, thereby precluding the need for commandment.

[Chassidut sees the sublimity of a mitzvah done without a command in those mitzvot that are technically "optional" as well (Likutei Sichot, vol. 32, p. 102, fn. 49)]

This is why their service completed the service of Moses and Aaron and sanctified the Tabernacle. Although the Divine Presence had already descended upon the Tabernacle, the Tabernacle and the Divine Presence remained two separate entities. This paralleled the service of Aaron, who had done all that he was commanded but had not reached the level where commandment was superfluous. He had remained separate from G-d, albeit fulfilling His will, and in reflection of his service the Divine Presence descended upon the Temple but did not become one with it.

"Fire came forth from G-d…": The Tabernacle's sanctification, the achievement of oneness with G-d, required an "alien fire", one that was different than any previous service. This was the service of Nadab and Abihu. This in turn elicited a fire from G-d that surpassed the first fire that descended through Aaron's sacrificial service, the outsider's service. Only his sons' spontaneous and instinctive offerings were capable of sanctifying the Tabernacle and achieving true oneness with G-d.

[Adapted by Moshe Yakov Wisknefsky from Likutei Sichot, vol. 31, pp. 178-80; Likutei Sichot, vol. 32, pp. 100-3
Copyright 2001 chabad of california / www.lachumash.org]

PrintSend this page to a friendShare this
Comment1 Comment

From the Lubavitcher Rebbe   More articles...  |   RSS Listing of Newest Articles by this Author
Moshe Yaakov Wisnefsky is a scholar, writer, editor and anthologist, living in Jerusalem. He has recently produced two monumental works: "Apples from the Orchard: Arizal on the Weekly Torah" and a Chumash translation with commentary based on the works of the Lubavitcher Rebbe (Kehot).
From the Kehot Chumash, produced by Chabad of California with an interpolated translation and commentary based on the works of the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, of righteous memory. Copyright (c) 2008 by Chabad of California, Inc. All rights reserved. For personal use only. The full volume is available for purchase at Kehotonline.

The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 

Reader Comments
Latest Comments:
Posted: Apr 20, 2012
Shemini - Exodus 10:3
Rashi stated that sanctification of the Mishkan was achieved by punishing Nadab and Abihu. The Rebbe comments that this was not a punishment, and they were actually performing a holy act. Rashi quotes a Midrash where Moses inferred that either he or Aaron would die based on G-d’s words in Exodus 29:43.

Regardless of the reasoning, I am bothered, not with the Torah, but with the commentaries that suggest that sanctification would be complete when someone dies. It would seem to me that we would want to exercise extreme caution with this reasoning least someone suggest that it resembles human sacrifice.

Also, the sages tell us that G-d did not want to disturb the joy of giving the Torah so he postponed the execution of Nadab and Abihu after they were allowed to gaze into heaven. For this same reason, I would suggest that G-d did not plan that they be executed at this time.
Posted By Anonymous, Plainview, NY/USA



 


Contemporary Kabbalists
Extreme Incense Offering
The Carnivorous and the Kind
The Bird of Divine Providence
Within and Beyond Intellect
Expand Themes of Featured Contemporary Kabbalists Articles
Themes of Featured Contemporary Kabbalists Articles