HOME | CONTACT US | DONATE LoginLOGIN Ask the RabbiASK THE RABBI
Chabad.org The Three Weeks
 
Chabad.org » Holidays » The Three Weeks » Beit Hamikdash - The Holy Temple » In Depth Study » The Purpose of Building the Bet Hamikdash
Events that lead to destructionThe 3 Weeks: July 20-August 10 2000Blueprint for the sanctuaryEssays on holiness, destruction and renewal
  Temple Mount
  Women's Courtyard
  Nikanor Gate
  Northern Chambers
  Southern Chambers
  The Altar
  Butchering Area
  Water Gate
  The Hearth
  Entrance Hall
  The Offices
  Inner Sanctuary
  Holy of Holies

In Depth Study

The difference of opinion between the Rambam and the Ramban whether the mitzvah of constructing the Beis HaMikdash also includes the obligation to fashion its utensils, or whether fashioning the utensils is a separate matter; the question whether this difference of opinion reflects a difference of opinion regarding the purpose of the Bet Hamikdash, that it was constructed as a medium for the manifestation of the Divine Presence or to provide the Jews with a centralized location for sacrificial worship.


 

 




 



         

     
 

The Purpose of Building the Bet Hamikdash

Adapted from Likkutei Sichot, Vol. IV, p. 1346-1347;
Vol. XI, Terumah

A Difference of Opinion between the Rambam and the Ramban

In Hilchot Bet HaBechirah, after stating the mitzvah to con­struct a Sanctuary, the Rambam writes:[1]

We must make utensils for the Sanctuary: an altar for... the sacrifices, a ramp to ascend the altars..., a washbasin with a pedestal, an altar for the incense offering, a menorah, and a table [for the showbread].

By mentioning the utensils in this manner, the Rambam underscores a theme which he mentions in Sefer HaMitzvot[2] — that the mitzvah to construct a Sanctuary also includes fashion­ing all the utensils necessary to perform the various different elements of sacrificial worship required in the Bet Hamikdash. There is no separate mitzvah to fashion any of these utensils.

In his Hasagos to Sefer HaMitzvos,[3] the Ramban differs and explains that the construction of the Bet Hamikdash should be considered as one mitzvah, and the fashioning of the utensils as separate mitzvos. To quote:

The utensils are not part of the structures. Rather, they are two mitzvos, which are not dependent on each other. We may offer sacrifices in the Beis [HaMikdash] although it is lacking utensils.[4]

What is the Purpose of the Bet Hamikdash:
Sacrificial Worship or Revealing G·d’s Presence

The difference of opinion between these two authorities is, conceivably, representative of a divergence of approach regard­ing a matter of greater scope. In Sefer Hamitzvot,[5] the Rambam describes the mitzvah of building the Bet Hamikdash as a command to “make a house for service where sacrifices will be offered;” i.e., he places an emphasis on the Bet Hamikdash as being the center for the sacrificial worship of G-d. Without the utensils necessary for this service, the sacrifices could not be offered. Therefore, the mitzvah of building the Beis HaMik­dash also includes fashioning the utensils necessary for this wor­ship.

This concept is also reflected in the Mishneh Torah,[6] where the Rambam begins his discussion of the mitzvah of construct­ing the Beis HaMikdash as follows: “It is a positive command­ment to construct a house for G-d, prepared for sacrifices to be offered within.” The mitzvah of building the Sanctuary is complete when it is “prepared for sacrifices to be offered within.”[7]

The Ramban, by contrast, sees the construction of the Bet Hamikdash as a commandment with a self-contained goal — building a sanctuary for the manifestation of G-d’s Presence. Thus in his Commentary to the Torah,[8] he writes: “[G-d’s] essential purpose in the Sanctuary was [the construction of] a resting place for the Divine Presence.”

In this conception, sacrificial worship represents an additional service that is not intrinsically related to the existence of the Bet Hamikdash. Accordingly, it is appropriate that the fashioning of the different utensils necessary for sacrificial wor­ship be considered as mitzvos in their own right.

A Resolution of the Differences: The Purpose of the Bet Hamikdash in Man’s Eyes and Its Purpose in the Eyes of G-d

This conception of the differences between the Ram­bam and the Ramban cannot, however, be accepted without further explanation. For the manifestation of G-d’s Pres­ence as a goal of the Bet Hamikdash is alluded to in the very verse[9] which the Rambam cites[10] as the prooftext for the commandment to build the Bet Hamikdash: “And you shall make Me a Sanctuary and I shall dwell within.” Moreover, the Rambam describes the mitz­vah of building the Beis HaMik­dash[11] in Hilchos Beis HaBechirah,[12] as constructing “a house for G-d,” indicating that preparing a structure in which G-d’s Presence is manifest is the primary purpose of the construction of the Bet Hamikdash.

Conversely, we are forced to say that the Ramban appreci­ated the establishment of a centralized place of worship as a fundamental goal which is fulfilled by the construction of the Bet Hamikdash. For there are passages from the Torah which clearly indicate this connection, emphasizing that G-d’s choice of “a place for His name to dwell” is associated with the com­mand — “there you will bring... your burnt offerings, your sacrifices....”[13]

Therefore, it must be explained that the purposes empha­sized by the Rambam and the Ramban are not to the exclusion of the other. The difference between their perspectives stems from the choice of the dimension which they choose to stress. The Rambam speaks of the Bet Hamikdash in terms of the mitzvos to be fulfilled by man in relating to G-d. Hence, he emphasizes the dimension of sacrificial worship. The Ramban, by contrast, focuses on “[G-d’s] essential purpose in the Sanctu­ary.” Therefore, he places the emphasis on the manifestation of G-d’s Presence.

In the Era of the Redemption

Both these purposes, the manifestation of G-d’s Presence and man’s sacrificial worship, will reach their utmost level of fulfillment in the Third Bet Hamikdash in the Era of the Redemption. For this will be “the Sanctuary of G-d, estab­lished by Your hands,”[14] and “there, we will offer to You our obligatory sacrifices... with love, in accord with the command of Your will.”[15]

May our study of the different elements of the Bet Hamikdash herald the time when we will rejoice in its construction. And may this take place in the immediate future.


[1].      1:6.

[2].      Positive commandment 20, General Principle 12.

[3].      Hasagos to positive commandment 33.

[4].      The Ramban, nevertheless, counts only the fashioning of the ark as a separate mitzvah, and not the fashioning of the altars, the menorah, and the table for the showbread. He explains that the fashioning of these sacred utensils are not con­sidered mitzvos in their own right, but rather as preparatory activities necessary to make possible the different services associated with these utensils. Note also a similar conception in the Minchas Chinuch (Mitzvah 95).

[5].      Positive commandment 20.

[6].      Hilchos Beis HaBechirah 1:1.

[7].      Although the Rambam maintains that the fashioning of the utensils is part of the mitzvah of constructing the Bet Hamikdash, the offering of the sacrifices is not dependent on the presence of all the utensils. Indeed, as the Rambam states in Hilchos Beis HaBechirah 6:15, we are allowed to offer sacrifices on the altar even when the Bet Hamikdash as a whole is destroyed. See also Megillas Esther to posi­tive commandment 33.

[8].      On Shmos 25:2.

[9].      Shmos, loc. cit.

[10].    Hilchos Beis HaBechirah 1:1.

[11].    Ibid. Note the contrast to the wording of the Rambam in Sefer Hamitzvot, positive commandment 20 quoted previously.

[12].    Indeed, the very name, Hilchos Beis HaBechirah, “The Laws of [G-d’s] Chosen House,” indicates an emphasis on the uniqueness of the Bet Hamikdash as the place chosen by G-d for His presence to be manifest.

[13].    Devarim 12:11 Note the explanation of this passage in the essay entitled “G-d’s Chosen House.”

[14].    Shmos 15:17.

[15].    The Shabbos Musaf liturgy, Siddur Tehillat HaShem, p. 195. In Chassidic thought (Torah Or, Vayechi, 46d ff; Toras Chaim, Vayechi, 95a ff), this is interpreted as re­ferring to the ultimate level of service, fulfilling the mitzvos, not out of a man’s desire to cling to G-d, but for His sake, as expressions of “His will.”